RM800 USER TESTAMONIALS


home - featuresgeneral overview and comments - description - other RM800 information & links
 RM800 news - online gallery - user testamonials - RM800 classifieds - RM800 FAQ - email an RM800 question

Here is your chance to state your take on the Yamaha RM800 mixing console.

Reviews must be submitted to me in email and please allow at least 48 hours before you start asking when your review is going to be posted.  Submit you review in TEXT format, and a picture of your RM800 if you have one (a picture is not required so don't worry about it if you don't have one).   Images must be in either JPG or GIF format.   I will take care of the rest.  Email your reviews and images HERE.



Drew Rydberg's studioWhen I was looking to upgrade my home studio console, your website was a big help in my purchase of a 16 channel RM800.  My old mixer was a very basic Allen & Heath 12x2 Scepter rack mixer that sounded *sweet* (very musical EQ), but just wasn't very flexible for my increasingly complicated tracking needs.  I needed busses, man!  I stumbled across mine on eBay for $450 and it's in excellent condition.  This is another example of a great-sounding, best-bang-for-the-buck piece of gear that never quite makes a blip on the radar.  I mainly use mine to track drums, bass, guitar and keys into my PC/Win98 DAW, using Cool Edit Pro and an Aardvark Systems soundcard; my monitors are Dynaudio BM5's and I use Monster or Mogami cables.  (in the photo you can see it way in the back of the studio!)  Using a good DI box and good mics, guitar and bass record great.  Tracking drums is fairly smooth; while it's not optimal to record a kit in the same room as your recording gear (space dictates it), it is an important feature that the RM800 is transparent enough so I can fix any small problems later within the DAW.  The mic preamps are of good quality, but I foresee myself upgrading to some Class A/ultra hi-fi mic pre's as soon as I can save up the dough.  The EQ is decent, a fairly basic setup; I miss my Allen & Heath's EQ, though (those Brits know their stuff).  I don't rely on the EQ too much, seeing how all EQ-ing usually goes on inside the computer.  The main strengths of the RM800 is routing & monitoring options, good headroom (accurate metering, what a concept); it's quiet, clean and it's not a typical black/dark colored small mixer you have to squint at -- the color scheme is actually waaaay better on the eyes.  At my day job, I use a Mackie 1604-VLZ (generally for monitoring only), and Mackie makes great product, but I don't think they are as well thought out, plus I feel cramped in whenever I twist some  knobs.  Yeah, the RM800's have a fairly big footprint, but I like a roomy, simple board and long-throw faders better.
                                                                                                                                                          --Drew Rydberg

HOME